![]() Thank you for all of you who like it, it means a lot honestly. I'm a proud part of it for many years but I know how hardheaded, or - as I learned from a friend - how NIMBYs can Blenderheads be. All very-very polarized reactions.īut to be completely honest I expected exactly this from our great Blender community :) They are similar to what I got everywhere else too where I shared this. The last thing it should be is flat, like every other 'rebrand' since 2011. Whenever the time is right for a rebrand, I hope it's a worthwhile exercise which encapsulates more than just a logo, such that the new identity showcases the depth and breadth of what is possible and any components of that identity must be created/generated using Blender. Remarks about things being out of date, long overdue serve no useful purpose. If the timeframe is 3-5 years then that's it, start messing with the programme and detracting from what's already in the pipeline you risk destabilising the momentum and focus. ![]() The current volume of inward investment shows a level of trust in the way things are being managed and more importantly delivered. Congrats on your recent commission for IKEA, but a logo is not a brand, it is one component of an identity which has many other factors. Back off and let the team focus on development, of which they're doing a great job, not some inane proposal like this which averts that focus. ![]() The current design isn't crooked! It's representative of a 3d environment and demonstrates that depth. Are you trying to suggest Blender is bloated? Don't agree that it's long overdue and your proposal looks like fat fingers, everything's overweight.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |